MICHELIN Energy XM 2+
MICHELIN
Key benefits for MICHELIN Energy XM 2+ tyre
Excellent longevity(1).
Travel more kilometres with the MICHELIN Energy XM2+ summer tyre. Featuring innovative Michelin compounds, this long-lasting tyre delivers 25% more mileage compared to the average of premium competitor tyres(1). Take to the roads with a tyre built to last on city commutes and weekend drives.
Energy XM 2+ TYRE REVIEW
There are 209 reviews of the Energy XM 2+
Global note
For any comments related to customer service (in-store experience, after-sales service, delivery, etc.) please contact us.
1-5 on 209 reviews
Posted on 13 June 2025 by Chean Le
Collected by Verified Reviews
Price as good as product (205/55/16 users)
I switched from BFgoodrich A/T to XM2 , price and mileage have increase 30%. The good is tyre more quiet.
Dry grip and braking
Longevity
Wet grip and braking
Vehicle: Kia Forte
Purchase date: 01/04/22
Posted on www.michelin.com.my
Posted on 18 May 2025 by Steve
Collected by Verified Reviews
Good tyre let me have a smooth drive
Good
Dry grip and braking
Longevity
Wet grip and braking
Vehicle: Nissan X-Trail
Purchase date: 18/05/25
Posted on www.michelin.com.my
Posted on 9 May 2025 by yang
Collected by Verified Reviews
Good
耐用 防滑
Dry grip and braking
Longevity
Wet grip and braking
Purchase date: 01/02/24
Posted on www.michelin.com.my
Posted on 8 May 2025 by James
Collected by Verified Reviews
Michelin XM2+
Have been using Michelin tyres for decades. Very comfortable and lasting. The new XM2 has improved further
Dry grip and braking
Longevity
Wet grip and braking
Vehicle: Toyota Corolla
Purchase date: 04/03/25
Posted on www.michelin.com.my
Posted on 25 April 2025 by Abdul Basit
Collected by Verified Reviews
Does not last long as expected and no concern with energy efficiency as advertised.
Tire Review: Michelin XM2 (175/65/R15) for 2008 Chevrolet Aveo 1.4 Sedan LUX I’ve had a rather disappointing experience with the Michelin XM2 in size 175/65/R15. Even my previous local/non-branded tires (195/60/R15) performed better in multiple aspects. Those older tires lasted longer, offered excellent grip on the road, provided better fuel efficiency, and gave me more confidence while driving. In contrast, the XM2 started to lose grip after just 10,000 km. I especially noticed a lack of traction during wet conditions. Recently, one of the XM2 tires even burst after running around 20,000 km, which was quite concerning. To be fair, the XM2 does have some positives—it looks good, offers a quiet ride, and is fairly comfortable. However, the grip is not up to the mark, and the fuel efficiency didn’t meet my expectations, despite the marketing claims I saw on various websites. Thanks to Almighty, there was no accident when the tire burst. But based on my experience, I wouldn’t recommend the XM2 for anyone prioritizing grip, durability, and fuel savings. Option for AVEO not available so selected for Cruze. Review and comments for Michelin as a feedback to improve the product. Let me know if it is claimable in warranty or not.
Dry grip and braking
Longevity
Wet grip and braking
Vehicle: Chevrolet Cruze
Purchase date: 27/03/21
Posted on www.michelin.com.my
Legal Mentions
1 - longevity - Longevity test conducted by China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co. Ltd (CATARC), on Michelin's request, in September 2018, on dimension 205/55 R16 91V on Volkswagen GOLF7 comparing MICHELIN ENERGY XM2+ versus 5 other major competitors. Longevity test run in average real usage with 20,000 km run and estimated longevity at the depth of Tread Wear Indicator.2 - worn definition - Worn means worn on machine (buffed) to 2.0mm Tread depth on the tyre tread surface.3 - braking on wet - Braking test on wet road condition conducted by China Automotive Technology and Research Center Co. Ltd (CATARC), on Michelin's request, in September 2018, on dimension 205/55 R16 91V on Volkswagen GOLF7 comparing MICHELIN ENERGY XM2+ versus 5 other major competitors.